Determination of PCR Efficiency (main) Determination of PCR Efficiency (1) Determination of PCR Efficiency (2) Determination of PCR Efficiency (3) Determination of PCR Efficiency (4) Determination of PCR Efficiency (5) New papers around PCR efficiency estimation and correction How good is a PCR efficiency estimate --
recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments
David Svec, Ales Tichopad, Vendula Novosadova, Michael W. Pfaffl, Mikael Kubistaa Biomolecular Detection and Quantification; available online 11 March 2015 We
have examined the imprecision in the estimation of PCR efficiency by
means of standard curves based on strategic experimental design with
large number of technical replicates. In particular, how robust this
estimation is in terms of a commonly varying factors: the instrument
used, the number of technical replicates performed and the effect of
the volume transferred throughout the dilution series. We used six
different qPCR instruments, we performed 1–16 qPCR replicates per
concentration and we tested 2–10 μl volume of analyte transferred,
respectively. We find that the estimated PCR efficiency varies
significantly across different instruments. Using a Monte Carlo
approach, we find the uncertainty in the PCR efficiency estimation may
be as large as 42.5% (95% CI) if standard curve with only one qPCR
replicate is used in 16 different plates. Based on our investigation we
propose recommendations for the precise estimation of PCR efficiency:
(1) one robust standard curve with at least 3–4 qPCR replicates at each
concentration shall be generated, (2) the efficiency is instrument
dependent, but reproducibly stable on one platform, and (3) using a
larger volume when constructing serial dilution series reduces sampling
error and enables calibration across a wider dynamic range.
Determination
of real-time PCR amplification efficiency
Chapter 3 - Quantification strategies in real-time PCR
by Michael W. Pfaffl in: A-Z of quantitative PCR (Editor: S.A. Bustin) International University Line (IUL), La Jolla, CA, USA Download Chapter 3 PDF Individual samples
generate different and individual fluorescence histories in kinetic
RT-PCR. The shapes of amplification curves differ in the steepness of
any fluorescence increase and in the absolute fluorescence levels at
plateau depending on background fluorescence levels. The PCR efficiency
has a major impact on the fluorescence history and the accuracy of the
calculated expression result and is critically influenced by PCR
reaction components. Efficiency evaluation is an essential
marker in gene quantification procedure. Constant amplification
efficiency in all compared samples is one important criterion for
reliable comparison between samples. This becomes crucially important
when analyzing the relationship between an unknown sequence versus a
standard sequence, which is performed in all relative quantification
models. In experimental designs employing standardization with
housekeeping genes, the demand for invariable amplification efficiency
between target and standard is often ignored, despite the fact that
corrections have been suggested. A correction for
efficiency, as performed in efficiency corrected
mathematically models, is strongly recommended and results in a
more reliable estimation of the ‘real expression ratio’ compared to NO
efficiency correction. Small efficiency differences between
target and reference gene generate false expression ratio, and the
researcher over- or under-estimates the ‘real’ initial mRNA amount.
The assessment of the
exact amplification efficiencies of target and reference genes must be
carried out before any calculation of the normalized gene expression is
done. LightCycler Relative Expression
Software, Q-Gene, REST and REST-XL software applications allow the
evaluation of amplification efficiency plots. Different tissues exhibit
different PCR efficiencies, caused by RT inhibitors, PCR inhibitors and
by variations in the total RNA fraction pattern extracted.
Experimental
comparison of relative RT-qPCR quantification approaches for gene
expression studies in poplar.
Regier N, Frey B. BMC Mol Biol. 2010 11: 57, 8 pages Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland. BACKGROUND: RT-qPCR is a powerful tool for analysing gene expression. It depends on measuring the increase in fluorescence emitted by a DNA-specific dye during the PCR reaction. For relative quantification, where the expression of a target gene is measured in relation to one or multiple reference genes, various mathematical approaches are published. The results of relative quantification can be considerably influenced by the chosen method. RESULTS: We quantified gene expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the roots of two black poplar clones, 58-861 and Poli, which were subjected to drought stress. After proving the chosen reference genes actin (ACT), elongation factor 1 (EF1) and ubiquitin (UBQ) to be constantly expressed in the different watering regimes, we applied different approaches for relative quantification to the same raw fluorescence data. The results obtained using the comparative Cq method, LinRegPCR, qBase software and the Pfaffl model showed a good correlation, whereas calculation according to the Liu and Saint method produced highly variable results. However, it has been shown that the most reliable approach for calculation of the amplification efficiency is using the mean increase in fluorescence during PCR in each individual reaction. Accordingly, we could improve the quality of our results by applying the mean amplification efficiencies for each amplicon to the Liu and Saint method. CONCLUSIONS: As we could show that gene expression results can vary depending on the approach used for quantification, we recommend to carefully evaluate different quantification approaches before using them in studies analysing gene expression. Several methods are described in the literature to calculate real-time PCR efficiency:
Determination of PCR efficiencies in competitive RT-PCR
Various external effects on PCR amplification effiency
|
New added
publications:
Efficiency of the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Booth CS, Pienaar E, Termaat JR, Whitney SE, Louw TM, Viljoen HJ. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0643. Chem Eng Sci. 2010 65(17): 4996-5006. The polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) has found wide application in biochemistry and molecular
biology such as gene expression studies, mutation detection, forensic
analysis and pathogen detection. Increasingly quantitative real time
PCR is used to assess copy numbers from overall yield. In this study
the yield is analyzed as a function of several processes: (1) thermal
damage of the template and polymerase occurs during the denaturing
step, (2) competition exists between primers and templates to either
anneal or form dsDNA, (3) polymerase binding to annealed products
(primer/ssDNA) to form ternary complexes and (4) extension of ternary
complexes. Explicit expressions are provided for the efficiency of each
process, therefore reaction conditions can be directly linked to the
overall yield. Examples are provided where different processes play the
yield-limiting role. The analysis will give researchers a unique
understanding of the factors that control the reaction and will aid in
the interpretation of experimental results.
pcrEfficiency: a Web tool for PCR amplification efficiency prediction. Mallona I, Weiss J, Marcos EC. Genetics, Institute of Plant Biotechnology (IBV), Technical University of Cartagena (UPCT), Campus Muralla del Mar, 30202 Cartagena, Spain BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 12: 404 Relative calculation of
differential gene expression in quantitative PCR reactions requires
comparison between amplification experiments that include reference
genes and genes under study. Ignoring the differences between their
efficiencies may lead to miscalculation of gene expression even with
the same starting amount of template. Although there are several tools
performing PCR primer design, there is no tool available that predicts
PCR efficiency for a given amplicon and primer pair.
We have used a
statistical approach based on 90 primer pair combinations amplifying
templates from bacteria, yeast, plants and humans, ranging in size
between 74 and 907 bp to identify the parameters that affect PCR
efficiency. We developed a generalized additive model fitting the data
and constructed an open source Web interface that allows the obtention
of oligonucleotides optimized for PCR with predicted amplification
efficiencies starting from a given sequence.
pcrEfficiency provides
an easy-to-use web interface allowing the prediction of PCR
efficiencies prior to web lab experiments thus easing quantitative
real-time PCR set-up. A web-based service as well the source code are
provided freely at http://srvgen.upct.es/efficiency.html
under the GPL v2 license.
Experimental Validation of a Fundamental Model for PCR Efficiency. Louw TM, Booth CS, Pienaar E, Termaat JR, Whitney SE, Viljoen HJ. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0643. Chem Eng Sci. 2011 Apr 15;66(8): 1783-1789. Recently a theoretical
analysis of PCR efficiency has been published by Booth et al., (2010).
The PCR yield is the product of three efficiencies: (i) the annealing
efficiency is the fraction of templates that form binary complexes with
primers during annealing, (ii)the polymerase binding efficiency is the
fraction of binary complexes that bind to polymerase to form ternary
complexes and (iii)the elongation efficiency is the fraction of ternary
complexes that extend fully. Yield is controlled by the smallest of the
three efficiencies and control could shift from one type of efficiency
to another over the course of a PCR experiment. Experiments have been
designed that are specifically controlled by each one of the
efficiencies and the results are consistent with the mathematical
model. The experimental data has also been used to quantify six key
parameters of the theoretical model. An important application of the
fully characterized model is to calculate initial template
concentration from real-time PCR data. Given the PCR protocol, the
midpoint cycle number (where the template concentration is half that of
the final concentration) can be theoretically determined and graphed
for a variety of initial DNA concentrations. Real-time results can be
used to calculate the midpoint cycle number and consequently the
initial DNA concentration, using this graph. The application becomes
particularly simple if a conservative PCR protocol is followed where
only the annealing efficiency is controlling.
Enhanced analysis of real-time PCR data by using a variable efficiency model: FPK-PCR. Lievens A, Van Aelst S, Van den Bulcke M, Goetghebeur E. Platform for Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, J. Wytsmanstreet 14, B-1050 Brussels, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S9 B-9000 Gent, Belgium and European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Molecular Biology and Genomics Unit, via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov 18. Current methodology in
real-time Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis performs well
provided PCR efficiency remains constant over reactions. Yet, small
changes in efficiency can lead to large quantification errors.
Particularly in biological samples, the possible presence of inhibitors
forms a challenge. We present a new approach to single reaction
efficiency calculation, called Full Process Kinetics-PCR (FPK-PCR). It
combines a kinetically more realistic model with flexible adaptation to
the full range of data. By reconstructing the entire chain of cycle
efficiencies, rather than restricting the focus on a 'window of
application', one extracts additional information and loses a level of
arbitrariness. The maximal efficiency estimates returned by the model
are comparable in accuracy and precision to both the golden standard of
serial dilution and other single reaction efficiency methods. The
cycle-to-cycle changes in efficiency, as described by the FPK-PCR
procedure, stay considerably closer to the data than those from other
S-shaped models. The assessment of individual cycle efficiencies
returns more information than other single efficiency methods. It
allows in-depth interpretation of real-time PCR data and reconstruction
of the fluorescence data, providing quality control. Finally, by
implementing a global efficiency model, reproducibility is improved as
the selection of a window of application is avoided.
Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR. Bar T, Kubista M, Tichopad A. Labonnet Ltd., 2 Hamelacha St., Ramat-Hasharon, 47445, Israel, TATAA Biocenter, Odinsgatan 28, 411 03 Göteborg, Sweden, Biotechnology Institute, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic and Charles University, Medical Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Dr. E. Beneše 13, 305 99 Pilsen - Bory, the Czech Republic. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Oct 19. Quantitative real-time
PCR (qPCR) is the method of choice for specific and sensitive
quantification of nucleic acids. However, data validation is still a
major issue, partially due to the complex effect of PCR inhibition on
the results. If undetected PCR inhibition may severely impair the
accuracy and sensitivity of results. PCR inhibition is addressed by
prevention, detection and correction of PCR results. Recently, a new
family of computational methods for the detection of PCR inhibition
called kinetics outlier detection (KOD) emerged. KOD methods are based
on comparison of one or a few kinetic parameters describing a test
reaction to those describing a set of reference reactions. Modern KOD
can detect PCR inhibition reflected by shift of the amplification curve
by merely half a cycle with specificity and sensitivity >90%. Based
solely on data analysis, these tools complement measures to improve and
control pre-analytics. KOD methods do not require labor and materials,
do not affect the reaction accuracy and sensitivity and they can be
automated for fast and reliable quantification. This review describes
the background of KOD methods, their principles, assumptions, strengths
and limitations. Finally, the review provides recommendations how to
use KOD and how to evaluate its performance.
Statistical methods for efficiency adjusted real-time PCR quantification. Yuan JS, Wang D, Stewart CN Jr. UTIA Genomics Hub, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. Biotechnol J. 2008 3(1): 112-23. The statistical treatment for hypothesis testing using real-time PCR data is a challenge for quantification of gene expression. One has to consider two key factors in precise statistical analysis of real-time PCR data: a well-defined statistical model and the integration of amplification efficiency (AE) into the model. Previous publications in real-time PCR data analysis often fall short in integrating the AE into the model. Novel, user-friendly, and universal AE-integrated statistical methods were developed for real-time PCR data analysis with four goals. First, we addressed the definition of AE, introduced the concept of efficiency-adjusted Delta Delta Ct, and developed a general mathematical method for its calculation. Second, we developed several linear combination approaches for the estimation of efficiency adjusted Delta Delta Ct and statistical significance for hypothesis testing based on different mathematical formulae and experimental designs. Statistical methods were also adopted to estimate the AE and its equivalence among the samples. A weighted Delta Delta Ct method was introduced to analyze the data with multiple internal controls. Third, we implemented the linear models with SAS programs and analyzed a set of data for each model. In order to allow other researchers to use and compare different approaches, SAS programs are included in the Supporting Information. Fourth, the results from analysis of different statistical models were compared and discussed. Our results underline the differences between the efficiency adjusted Delta Delta Ct methods and previously published methods, thereby better identifying and controlling the source of errors introduced by real-time PCR data analysis. A mechanistic model of PCR for accurate quantification of quantitative PCR data. Boggy GJ, Woolf PJ. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America. PLoS One. 2010 5(8): e12355. BACKGROUND: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a workhorse laboratory technique for measuring the concentration of a target DNA sequence with high accuracy over a wide dynamic range. The gold standard method for estimating DNA concentrations via qPCR is quantification cycle () standard curve quantification, which requires the time- and labor-intensive construction of a standard curve. In theory, the shape of a qPCR data curve can be used to directly quantify DNA concentration by fitting a model to data; however, current empirical model-based quantification methods are not as reliable as standard curve quantification. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have developed a two-parameter mass action kinetic model of PCR (MAK2) that can be fitted to qPCR data in order to quantify target concentration from a single qPCR assay. To compare the accuracy of MAK2-fitting to other qPCR quantification methods, we have applied quantification methods to qPCR dilution series data generated in three independent laboratories using different target sequences. Quantification accuracy was assessed by analyzing the reliability of concentration predictions for targets at known concentrations. Our results indicate that quantification by MAK2-fitting is as reliable as standard curve quantification for a variety of DNA targets and a wide range of concentrations. SIGNIFICANCE: We anticipate that MAK2 quantification will have a profound effect on the way qPCR experiments are designed and analyzed. In particular, MAK2 enables accurate quantification of portable qPCR assays with limited sample throughput, where construction of a standard curve is impractical. Shape based kinetic outlier detection in real-time PCR. Sisti D, Guescini M, Rocchi MB, Tibollo P, D'Atri M, Stocchi V. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 12;11: 186 BACKGROUND: Real-time PCR has
recently become the technique of choice for absolute
and relative nucleic acid quantification. The gold standard
quantification method in real-time PCR assumes that the compared
samples have similar PCR efficiency. However, many factors present in
biological samples affect PCR kinetic, confounding quantification
analysis. In this work we propose a new strategy to detect outlier
samples, called SOD.
RESULTS:Richards function was
fitted on fluorescence readings to parameterize
the amplification curves. There was not a significant correlation
between calculated amplification parameters (plateau, slope and
y-coordinate of the inflection point) and the Log of input DNA
demonstrating that this approach can be used to achieve a "fingerprint"
for each amplification curve. To identify the outlier runs, the
calculated parameters of each unknown sample were compared to those of
the standard samples. When a significant underestimation of starting
DNA molecules was found, due to the presence of biological inhibitors
such as tannic acid, IgG or quercitin, SOD efficiently marked these
amplification profiles as outliers. SOD was subsequently compared with
KOD, the current approach based on PCR efficiency estimation. The data
obtained showed that SOD was more sensitive than KOD, whereas SOD and
KOD were equally specific.
CONCLUSION:Our results
demonstrated, for the first time, that outlier detection
can be based on amplification shape instead of PCR efficiency. SOD
represents an improvement in real-time PCR analysis because it
decreases the variance of data thus increasing the reliability of
quantification.
WEB INTERFACE - Cy0 is a new method in Real-time PCR analysis that does not require the assumption of equal efficiency between unknowns and standard curve (Michele Guescini, Davide Sisti, & Renato Panebianco, 2010) Quality control for quantitative PCR based on amplification compatibility test. Tichopad A, Bar T, Pecen L, Kitchen RR, Kubista M, Pfaffl MW. Methods. 2010 50(4): 308-312 Quantitative qPCR is a
routinely used method for the accurate quantification of nucleic acids.
Yet it may generate erroneous results if the amplification process is
obscured by inhibition or generation of aberrant side-products such as
primer dimers. Several methods have been established to control for
pre-processing performance that rely on the introduction of a
co-amplified reference sequence, however there is currently no method
to allow for reliable control of the amplification process without
directly modifying the sample mix. Herein we present a statistical
approach based on multivariate analysis of the amplification response
data generated in real-time. The amplification trajectory in its most
resolved and dynamic phase is fitted with a suitable model. Two
parameters of this model, related to amplification efficiency, are then
used for calculation of the Z-score statistics. Each studied sample is
compared to a predefined reference set of reactions, typically
calibration reactions. A probabilistic decision for each individual
Z-score is then used to identify the majority of inhibited reactions in
our experiments. We compare this approach to univariate methods using
only the sample specific amplification efficiency as reporter of the
compatibility. We demonstrate improved identification performance using
the multivariate approach compared to the univariate approach. Finally
we stress that the performance of the amplification compatibility test
as a quality control procedure depends on the quality of the reference
set.
Efficiency clustering for low-density microarrays and its application to qPCR Eric F Lock, Ryan Ziemiecke, J. S. Marron and Dirk P Dittmer BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11 Background Pathway-targeted or
low-density arrays are used more and more frequently in biomedical
research, particularly those arrays that are based on quantitative
real-time PCR. Typical QPCR arrays contain 96-1024 primer pairs or
probes, and they bring with it the promise of being able to reliably
measure differences in target levels without the need to establish
absolute standard curves for each and every target. To achieve reliable
quantification all primer pairs or array probes must perform with the
same efficiency.
ResultsOur results indicate
that QPCR primer-pairs differ significantly both in reliability and
efficiency. They can only be used in an array format if the raw data
(so called CT values for real-time QPCR) are transformed to take these
differences into account. We developed a novel method to obtain
efficiency-adjusted CT values. We introduce transformed confidence
intervals as a novel measure to identify unreliable primers. We
introduce a robust clustering algorithm to combine efficiencies of
groups of probes, and our results indicate that using n < 10
cluster-based mean efficiencies is comparable to using individually
determined efficiency adjustments for each primer pair (N = 96-1024).
ConclusionsCareful estimation of
primer efficiency is necessary to avoid significant measurement
inaccuracies. Transformed confidence intervals are a novel method to
assess and interprete the reliability of an efficiency estimate in a
high throughput format. Efficiency clustering as developed here serves
as a compromise between the imprecision in assuming uniform efficiency,
and the computational complexity and danger of over-fitting when using
individually determined efficiencies.
A new real-time PCR method to overcome significant quantitative inaccuracy due to slight amplification inhibition. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 30;9: 326 Guescini M, Sisti D, Rocchi MB, Stocchi L, Stocchi V. BACKGROUND: Real-time PCR analysis is a sensitive DNA quantification technique that has recently gained considerable attention in biotechnology, microbiology and molecular diagnostics. Although, the cycle-threshold (Ct) method is the present "gold standard", it is far from being a standard assay. Uniform reaction efficiency among samples is the most important assumption of this method. Nevertheless, some authors have reported that it may not be correct and a slight PCR efficiency decrease of about 4% could result in an error of up to 400% using the Ct method. This reaction efficiency decrease may be caused by inhibiting agents used during nucleic acid extraction or copurified from the biological sample. We propose a new method (Cy0) that does not require the assumption of equal reaction efficiency between unknowns and standard curve. RESULTS: The Cy0 method is based on the fit of Richards' equation to real-time PCR data by nonlinear regression in order to obtain the best fit estimators of reaction parameters. Subsequently, these parameters were used to calculate the Cy0 value that minimizes the dependence of its value on PCR kinetic. The Ct, second derivative (Cp), sigmoidal curve fitting method (SCF) and Cy0 methods were compared using two criteria: precision and accuracy. Our results demonstrated that, in optimal amplification conditions, these four methods are equally precise and accurate. However, when PCR efficiency was slightly decreased, diluting amplification mix quantity or adding a biological inhibitor such as IgG, the SCF, Ct and Cp methods were markedly impaired while the Cy0 method gave significantly more accurate and precise results. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that Cy0 represents a significant improvement over the standard methods for obtaining a reliable and precise nucleic acid quantification even in sub-optimal amplification conditions overcoming the underestimation caused by the presence of some PCR inhibitors. Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data. Ruijter JM, Ramakers C, Hoogaars WM, Karlen Y, Bakker O, van den Hoff MJ, Moorman AF. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 37(6): e45 Despite the central role of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the quantification of mRNA transcripts, most analyses of qPCR data are still delegated to the software that comes with the qPCR apparatus. This is especially true for the handling of the fluorescence baseline. This article shows that baseline estimation errors are directly reflected in the observed PCR efficiency values and are thus propagated exponentially in the estimated starting concentrations as well as 'fold-difference' results. Because of the unknown origin and kinetics of the baseline fluorescence, the fluorescence values monitored in the initial cycles of the PCR reaction cannot be used to estimate a useful baseline value. An algorithm that estimates the baseline by reconstructing the log-linear phase downward from the early plateau phase of the PCR reaction was developed and shown to lead to very reproducible PCR efficiency values. PCR efficiency values were determined per sample by fitting a regression line to a subset of data points in the log-linear phase. The variability, as well as the bias, in qPCR results was significantly reduced when the mean of these PCR efficiencies per amplicon was used in the calculation of an estimate of the starting concentration per sample. Assessing the performance capabilities of LRE-based assays for absolute quantitative real-time PCR. Rutledge RG, Stewart D. PLoS One. 2010 5(3):e9731. BACKGROUND: Linear regression of efficiency or LRE introduced a new paradigm for conducting absolute quantification, which does not require standard curves, can generate absolute accuracies of +/-25% and has single molecule sensitivity. Derived from adapting the classic Boltzmann sigmoidal function to PCR, target quantity is calculated directly from the fluorescence readings within the central region of an amplification profile, generating 4-8 determinations from each amplification reaction. FINDINGS: Based on generating a linear representation of PCR amplification, the highly visual nature of LRE analysis is illustrated by varying reaction volume and amplification efficiency, which also demonstrates how LRE can be used to model PCR. Examining the dynamic range of LRE further demonstrates that quantitative accuracy can be maintained down to a single target molecule, and that target quantification below ten molecules conforms to that predicted by Poisson distribution. Essential to the universality of optical calibration, the fluorescence intensity generated by SYBR Green I (FU/bp) is shown to be independent of GC content and amplicon size, further verifying that absolute scale can be established using a single quantitative standard. Two high-performance lambda amplicons are also introduced that in addition to producing highly precise optical calibrations, can be used as benchmarks for performance testing. The utility of limiting dilution assay for conducting platform-independent absolute quantification is also discussed, along with the utility of defining assay performance in terms of absolute accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Founded on the ability to exploit lambda gDNA as a universal quantitative standard, LRE provides the ability to conduct absolute quantification using few resources beyond those needed for sample preparation and amplification. Combined with the quantitative and quality control capabilities of LRE, this kinetic-based approach has the potential to fundamentally transform how real-time qPCR is conducted. Bias in the Cq value observed with hydrolysis probe based quantitative PCR can be corrected with the estimated PCR efficiency value. Tuomi JM, Voorbraak F, Jones DL, Ruijter JM. Methods. 2010 50(4): 313-22 For real-time monitoring of PCR amplification of DNA, quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays use various fluorescent reporters. DNA binding molecules and hybridization reporters (primers and probes) only fluoresce when bound to DNA and result in the non-cumulative increase in observed fluorescence. Hydrolysis reporters (TaqMan probes and QZyme primers) become fluorescent during DNA elongation and the released fluorophore remains fluorescent during further cycles; this results in a cumulative increase in observed fluorescence. Although the quantification threshold is reached at a lower number of cycles when fluorescence accumulates, in qPCR analysis no distinction is made between the two types of data sets. Mathematical modeling shows that ignoring the cumulative nature of the data leaves the estimated PCR efficiency practically unaffected but will lead to at least one cycle underestimation of the quantification cycle (C(q) value), corresponding to a 2-fold overestimation of target quantity. The effect on the target reference ratio depends on the PCR efficiency of the target and reference amplicons. The leftward shift of the C(q) value is dependent on the PCR efficiency and with sufficiently large C(q) values, this shift is constant. This allows the C(q) to be corrected and unbiased target quantities to be obtained.
|
|